LIVE · cybersecurity feed
Live wire
CISA’s logging guidance works beyond governmentCISA orders urgent patching of actively exploited Zimbra flawZero-Click Grok Chat History Theft: Adversa AI Demonstrates Cryptographic Context InjectionMalware Hijacks Android Car Head UnitsCritical Flaw in NASA/JPL Open-Source Spacecraft Command Software Allowed Unauthenticated Command ExecutionCVE-2026-73570 · U.S. CISA adds Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogCVE-2024-3094 · Connecting the Dots: Securing the Overlooked Corners of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Supply ChainHow an Emerging Industrial Protocol Family Could Put OT at Risk14 Trojanized npm Packages Drop RedC2 4.0 Linux Backdoor With AI-Assisted C2Hundreds of leaked AWS keys give full control over corporate accounts
cloud

NIST Warns of Unique Security Risks in Multi-Cloud Environments

NIST has set out 23 novel challenges that arise in multi-cloud environments and has encouraged the cyber community to find solutions

zeroday.news ·

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has issued a warning to organizations regarding the unique cybersecurity and compliance challenges inherent in multi-cloud environments. NIST's new report, published on August 21, highlights that utilizing two or more cloud service providers (CSPs) introduces complexities that make it difficult to maintain consistent security policies, apply uniform controls, and enforce robust authentication protocols compared to single-cloud or on-premises architectures.

A primary reason for these difficulties is that different CSPs operate with distinct security models, tools, configurations, and shared responsibility frameworks. While multi-cloud adoption is increasing, partly due to its benefit of reducing reliance on a single provider—thereby allowing operations to continue during an outage or cyberattack affecting one CSP—NIST emphasizes the significant security challenges it simultaneously introduces.

The report identifies 23 novel challenges across several critical areas. In identity and access management, security teams struggle to ensure consistent implementation of access control policies and authorization measures across diverse CSP systems, each with unique native architectures. This includes verifying the deployment of multi-factor authentication (MFA) or biometric verification across all CSPs for specific information systems supporting cloud services. These challenges are further complicated by the need to verify the access control policies of third-party vendors used by CSPs.

Vulnerability management also becomes more intricate in multi-cloud settings. CSPs often provide vulnerability reports in varying timeframes and formats, hindering a unified approach to patch management across an enterprise. Additionally, customers may lack direct access to CSPs' information systems, preventing them from conducting independent vulnerability scans.

For incident response and disaster recovery, organizations face hurdles due to CSPs potentially not providing timely or comprehensive incident data, or delivering it in non-standardized formats. Administrative access privileges necessary for independent monitoring of cloud services across different providers may also be withheld. Planning for disaster recovery is further complicated by CSPs frequently withholding contingency planning policies and test results, citing concerns over privileged backend information and overall system security.

Data protection is another area of concern. Organizations depend on CSPs to ensure security, encryption, and regulatory standards are met. However, inconsistent implementations of data security measures, such as encryption, among different CSPs in a multi-cloud environment can lead to non-compliance with data protection regulations across various jurisdictions, including laws like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Obtaining comprehensive information system security documentation from all providers involved in data protection also presents difficulties in demonstrating compliance.

NIST advocates for robust governance frameworks, centralized visibility, consistent policy enforcement, and a strong emphasis on automation and standardization to tackle these multi-cloud challenges. The institute stresses that addressing these issues will require a collaborative effort from the broader cybersecurity community.

The report aims to establish a structured problem statement and a shared vocabulary to inform future research, procurement strategies, standards development, and solution design across government, industry, and academia. NIST is actively seeking input from federal agencies, industry partners, researchers, and the cybersecurity community, with a public comment period open until October 5, 2026.

cloud
ShareXLinkedInWhatsAppFacebook

More News

view all →
breach

ReliaQuest confirms failed data-theft attack after ShinyHunters breach

Cybersecurity company ReliaQuest has confirmed that one of its employees was targeted in a social engineering attack after hackers impersonated a member of the security team. [...]

ransomware

Tricky 'SynkLoader' Multitool May Herald Ransomware

An advanced, multilingual malware family brings back a trick from yesteryear — screen hijacking — for effective password theft, along with a slew of novel features.

security

Your data doesn’t die when you do (Lock and Code S07E17)

This week on the Lock and Code podcast, we speak with Tamara Kneese about the many ways your data remains long after your die.

malware

ToxicPanda Banking Trojan Matures into Enterprise Threat

The latest version of the Android malware has new features that expand its global reach and put more than users' financial applications at risk.

security

AliExpress caught using silent audio to fingerprint visitors’ browsers

Silent audio processing on the AliExpress website was found helping to fingerprint visitors’ browsers without relying on cookies.

security

Microsoft Teams now lets admins block external bots from meetings

Microsoft is rolling out a new Teams meeting protection policy that allows administrators to automatically block all identified external bots from joining Teams meetings. [...]