ICE collected nearly a million DNA samples last year.

Reports indicate that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) collected close to one million DNA samples over the past year. This substantial collection effort highlights an expanding practice within the agency, raising questions about the scope and implications of such biometric data acquisition.
The collection of DNA samples by law enforcement agencies typically involves swabbing the inside of an individual's cheek to gather cells containing genetic material. These samples are then processed to create a DNA profile, which is a unique numerical representation derived from specific non-coding regions of the DNA. This profile can be stored in databases and used for identification purposes, such as linking individuals to crime scenes or verifying identities.
For ICE, the collection of DNA samples likely serves multiple purposes, including identity verification, tracking individuals, and potentially aiding in criminal investigations. The agency’s broad mandate concerning immigration enforcement could see these samples collected from a wide range of individuals encountered during their operations, including those apprehended at the border, within the interior, or during detention.
The nearly one million samples collected within a single year suggest a systematic and widespread implementation of this policy. This scale of collection implies significant logistical infrastructure and a standardized protocol for sample acquisition, processing, and storage. Such programs often leverage existing federal databases, like the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), to store and cross-reference profiles.
The practice of collecting DNA samples by law enforcement, particularly from individuals who may not have been charged with a crime, often sparks debate regarding privacy rights and civil liberties. Concerns typically revolve around the long-term storage of genetic information, the potential for misuse, and the scope of access to these databases. Critics often argue for stricter regulations and oversight to prevent the creation of a comprehensive genetic registry without adequate safeguards.
Mitigation strategies for individuals concerned about such data collection generally involve understanding their rights regarding providing biometric data and seeking legal counsel where appropriate. Policy discussions, on the other hand, often focus on legislative efforts to define the boundaries of DNA collection by government agencies, ensuring proportionality and adherence to constitutional protections.
The reported collection of nearly a million DNA samples by ICE underscores a broader trend in law enforcement and national security agencies towards increased reliance on biometric data for identification and tracking. This development places the agency at the forefront of a complex discussion about technology, privacy, and the evolving nature of surveillance in a modern state.

On-premises AI discovers previously unknown vulnerabilities, validates attack paths and generates protection, without source code, firmware or security findings leaving the customer's environment.

OpenAI admits it did not disclose an incident where autonomous AI agents hijacked a German wiki, created 18,000 posts, shared answers, and bypassed restrictions, saying it treated the activity as model "misalignment" rather than a security breach. [...]

Plus: Tens of millions of US and Canadian drivers’ licenses go up for sale on the dark web, the US military finally tries to tackle the risk online ad data poses to troops, and more.

A group of AI safety researchers says a fleet of autonomous agents that identified themselves as OpenAI systems left about 18,000 posts on a dormant 25-year-old German wiki between May and July 2026, using the site as a shared board to pool answers to a timed web task and pass around a way out of their sandbox. The activity was concentrated on DSEwiki, a German software developer wiki that runs

Threat actors are exploiting the newly disclosed PaperCut flaws to facilitate credential theft in attacks targeting the education sector in the U.S. and Europe. The Arctic Wolf Adversary Research Team said it observed attackers exploiting CVE-2026-81578 and CVE-2026-82078 – an authentication bypass and remote code execution chain – to conduct command execution and reconnaissance, as well as

Broadcom patched two VMware Workstation/Fusion VM-escape bugs. No workarounds exist. Update to version 26H1u1 immediately. Broadcom published advisory VMSA-2026-0007, patching two vulnerabilities in VMware Workstation and Fusion that allow an attacker inside a virtual machine to execute code on the underlying host. One is rated Critical. Neither has a workaround. The first vulnerability, tracked a