LIVE · cybersecurity feed
Live wire
breachcritical

Agentic AI for Cyber Defenders: What Security Teams Built at Black Hat USA 2026

Agentic AI armed attackers first, but it also put real building power in defenders’ hands. Here’s what security practitioners built in two days at Black Hat USA 2026, and how the CyberAgents Exchange keeps that work compounding long after the event. Key takeaways Building defensive cybersecurity tooling no longer requires a developer. Agentic tooling drove the cost of finding and exploiting a vuln

zeroday.news ·

At Black Hat USA 2026, nearly 100 cybersecurity practitioners participated in a 48-hour event called SWARM, hosted by Tenable and sponsored by AWS, with technical staff from Anthropic serving as judges. The event focused on leveraging agentic AI to develop open-source defensive cybersecurity tools, which are now available on the CyberAgents Exchange. The initiative aimed to address the growing asymmetry in cyber capabilities, where agentic AI has significantly lowered the cost for attackers to find and exploit vulnerabilities, a trend not seen since the 1990s.

The core premise of SWARM was to empower defenders to build automation without requiring extensive development expertise, thereby closing a distribution gap that often sees security teams independently solving the same problems. Participants were tasked with identifying a key operational pain point and building a practical solution, which then had to be published open source to the CyberAgents Exchange to be eligible for prizes.

The projects developed at SWARM largely focused on "unglamorous" but critical tasks that consume significant time for security teams. These included agents for prioritizing findings, reconciling disparate asset inventories, correlating scanner outputs, and automating the verification of mitigations. Instead of building autonomous red teams or self-healing networks, the participants concentrated on creating connective tissue—tools that normalize data across existing systems, wrap current security tools for agent interaction, and package recurring analyst tasks into reusable skills.

One team created an agent that reads vendor advisories and mitigation notes, compares them against live findings, and recommends risk recasts, a task typically performed manually by senior engineers. Another developed an agent to correlate two different scanners to determine if a code flaw was actually reachable in a running application. A third focused on providing auditable evidence that a finding had already been mitigated.

The top three teams were recognized for their impactful contributions. First place went to Team Vauban for their "Chokepoint Finder," an MIT-licensed tool designed to address the "selection problem" faced by security teams overwhelmed with thousands of open findings but limited capacity for remediation. Chokepoint Finder, published as four agentic components (an agent, MCP server, skill, and playbook), ranks fixes rather than individual findings. It groups findings by the single action that resolves them (e.g., patches, base images, IAM roles) and then identifies the shortest ordered list of actions that mitigates the most weighted risk.

The Chokepoint Finder leverages its playbook to agentically inspect and rank fixes through eight distinct stages, incorporating a human decision point. It operates with a strict methodology: the agent holds no write credentials, evidence it cannot read or date results in a hold, and a re-scan is required to prove risk reduction before a record is closed. In a demonstration, the tool collapsed an estate with 3,734 synthetic findings across 783 assets into just seven concrete remediation actions. Each member of Team Vauban received $2,000 in Anthropic credits and an AWS specialist certification.

The winning ranking engine developed by Team Vauban is notable for its simplicity, shipping as a skill that runs solely on the Python standard library, requiring no additional packages, installation steps, or build pipelines. This demonstrates that practitioners can produce deployable solutions within a short timeframe, making such tools accessible for immediate use by colleagues. The overall objective of SWARM and the CyberAgents Exchange is to foster a collaborative environment where defensive cyber capabilities can compound, much like offensive tooling, by providing an easy way for defenders to share and leverage each other's work.

breachvulnerabilitypatchaicloud
ShareXLinkedInWhatsAppFacebook

More News

view all →
breachcritical

Metabase SQLi zero-day exploited in customer data-theft attacks

A critical Metabase SQL injection vulnerability was exploited in zero-day attacks to breach customer instances in data theft attacks, known to impact Framework and Tally. [...]

malwarehigh

Living off the coding agent: Two tales of tunnels and LaunchAgents

Agent-parented reverse tunnels and LaunchAgents can expose a local admin app to the internet. Endpoint still needs to treat that as high severity even when the activity looks like vibe-coded ops, not confirmed malware.

ai

OpenAI pledges to add Astra security as Anthropic loosens Fable's leash

Or how I learned to stop worrying and love dangerous AI

ai

AI chat bots are sliding into League of Legends friend requests

Chat bots are sending friend requests in Riot immediately after ending your game. What are the scammers up to now?

security

Friday Squid Blogging: Arctic Bobtail Squid Video

Nice video of the Arctic bobtail squid. As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered. Blog moderation policy.

security

Meta ordered to pay $942 million over harm to children

A new court ruling not only fined Meta to the extent of $942 million but also ordered it to improve its age assurance tools.